Wikipedia is being used as a libelous, defamatory tool to control the covid-19 narrative

Wikipedia is being used as a libelous, defamatory tool to control the covid-19 narrative
Image: Wikipedia is being used as a libelous, defamatory tool to control the covid-19 narrative

(Natural News) In any war, the successor lives to write history; that’s why controlling the covid-19 narrative is so important for the authoritarian elites who are calling the shots. Facebook has announced they will only allow information on their platform that is approved by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control, while agreeing to disparage, defame, block and shadow ban any information to the contrary.

This is one of many warning signs that the covid-19 outbreaks are less a pandemic and more so a planned set of controls that are being rolled out not only for political reasons, but also to restrict personal liberty, force people to do things against their will, control the free market economy, and cover up crimes of the medical and pharmaceutical establishment.

Controlling the narrative using Wikipedia as a libelous weapon

As social media platforms fall in line with governing authorities such as the WHO and the CDC, they have become tools of defamation, manipulation and censorship, shunning truthful testimony and evidence from front line journalists, whistle-blowers, doctors, nurses and scientists.

Wikipedia is currently being used as a libelous, defamatory tool to control the covid-19 narrative, to not only cover up the crimes of governments and pharmaceutical companies, but to also disparage and discredit anyone who dissents to the official government narrative on covid-19. These systems of information and thought control have been set up over time, in preparation for global events such as covid-19 outbreaks. Wikipedia is the go-to destination for people, places and things, and is even used by the all-knowing Amazon Alexa to brainwash the public on select topics, to steer the public away from valuable sources of truthful information.

Wikipedia was once an unbiased, open source platform. Over the years it became hijacked by politically-motivated financiers who use it to smear, disparage and discredit their competition. Wikipedia is now supported by the Wikimedia foundation, which is funded by politically motivated financiers, some named and some anonymous. In exchange for their funds, these financiers are allowed to use Wikipedia as a libelous, defamatory tool to destroy the reputation of journalists, doctors, scientists and other skeptics and truth tellers.

Just look what they have done to discredit Dr. Judy A. Mikovits, an intelligent research scientist who made important discoveries on retroviruses in vaccines and their connection to chronic fatigue syndrome. Wikipedia claims that her “medical claims are discredited,” that she is a “promoter of conspiracy theories,” and has been “accused of scientific misconduct.” The attack on Mikovits and her work is conducted because she worked closely with Dr. Anthony Fauci and openly speaks about his corrupt connections, scientific fraud and misguided advice. (Watch the Dr. Judy Mikovits interview with the Health Ranger discussing the coronavirus pandemic, Fauci fraud, NIH corruption and more…)

Wikipedia is part of a larger network of deception

After the smears are written and published on Wikipedia, these politically-motivated financiers can lock their targets out so they cannot make corrections to their own biography. There is no recourse or appeal to restore one’s own reputation on Wikipedia, forcing many intelligent researchers, journalists and scientists to be victims of libel indefinitely. The narrative is further controlled by “fact checking” organizations like News Guard, Snopes, PolitiFact, etc. that go along with these wicked narratives and personal hit jobs. These fact checkers are neither factual nor independent – just political spin machines that are part of a greater network of thought control.

Like Facebook, Wikipedia has decided there is an approved narrative on all topics of health, as long as it is in line with the public pronouncements of the WHO and the CDC. Whatever the WHO and the CDC recommend is considered the end-all doctrine, presumed to be 100 percent accurate and authoritative — advice that is used to fuel government mandates and to control populations.

And that is exactly what is happening: Sickness is being used as a weapon to control people and information is being controlled to manipulate people into compliance.

Sources include:

Brighteon.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

<!–
–>